Core PAs with increased resilience to CC

MODIFIED INDICATOR:
O1. Reductions in the rates of loss of principal habitat types (Peruvian yungas (PY), South Amazonian moist forest (SAMF), and Central Andean Puna (CAP), generating benefits for BD and avoiding the loss of carbon sinksOLD INDICATOR:
O1. Reductions in the rates of loss of principal habitat types in the landscapes (Peruvian yungas (PY), South Amazonian moist forest (SAMF), and Central Andean Puna (CAP), generating benefits for BD and avoiding the loss of carbon sinks
MODIFIED INDICATOR:
O2. Increases in ecosystem connectivity within the landscapes and adjacent ecosystems, as measured by the number of hectares of ecosystems in good condition under a conservation regime, within the connectivity corridors of each landscape.OLD INDICATOR:
O2. Increases in ecosystem connectivity (measured by patch size, form and juxtaposition).
MODIFIED INDICATOR:
O4. Reduction in the probability of ecosystem affectation by anthropic threats, as assessed through standard SERNANP methodologyOLD INDICATOR:
O4. Reductions in levels of ecosystem affectation by anthropic threats, as assessed through standard SERNANP methodology
O3. Reductions in threat ratings for target PAs, as assessed in METTs
1.1 Increase in PA management capacities, as assessed in METTs
1.3 Level of local participation in oversight and control of PAs, as measured by the existence of conservation agreements whereby local communities complement SERNANP in actions of oversight and governance PA governance
1.5 Increase in the coverage of areas under conservation, to protect key ecosystems
1.6 Availability of financial resources (US$) for the management of the target PAs, taking into account the implications of climate change
MODIFIED INDICATOR:
1.2 Effectiveness of oversight and control in target PAs, as measured by the enforcement of oversight and control strategies that incorporate climate change context and landscape-level actions (at least PAs and buffer zones).OLD INDICATOR:
1.2 Effectiveness of oversight and control in target PAs, as measured by numbers of personnel per unit area.MODIFIED INDICATOR:
1.4 Degree of incorporation of CC resilience considerations into management instruments of PAs, conservation areas and territorial/indigenous reserves.OLD INDICATOR:
1.4 Degree of incorporation of CC resilience considerations into management instruments.
2.2 Increase in the potential of tree-based production systems (coffee and cocoa) to buffer PAs against the direct and indirect implications of CC, in the target provinces bordering PAs
2.3 Increase in the role of community-based forest management (CBFM) in motivating the protection of forests under conditions of CC, and reinforcing occupancy rights of local communities
2.4 Increase in the contribution of agroforestry systems in buffer zones to the generation of GEBs, the stabilization of landscapes and resilience to CC
2.6 Degree of incorporation of CC resilience and BD considerations in rural extension programmes
MODIFIED INDICATOR:
2.1 Degree of incorporation of considerations of CC resilience in planning instruments linked at national and subnational levels in the target provinces bordering PAs.OLD INDICATOR:
2.1 Degree of incorporation of considerations of CC resilience in planning instruments in the target provinces bordering PAs
MODIFIED INDICATOR:
2.5 Increased participation by local communities promoting gender equality in environmental governance in landscapes.2.5 Increased participation by local communities in environmental governance in buffer zones.

CC-resilient production landscapes buffering PAs