Effective national framework for managing wildlife trade. Strengthened national policy, legal and institutional framework for regulating illegal commercial wildlife trade and combating illegal wildlife trade

0.1: Extent to which legal or policy or institutional frameworks are in place for conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems. (IRRF Output 2.5 indicator 2.5.1)
0.2:Number of direct project beneficiaries:
- Number of government agency staff including enforcement officers who improved their knowledge and skills on IWT due to the project (m/f)
- Number of local people in project demonstration areas benefiting from engagement in conservation activities, reduced HWC impacts and improved livelihoods (m/f)0.3: Expert evaluation of IWT annual volume (number of animal specimens – body parts or live animals) in Indonesia based on the WCS IWT database
0.4: Number of individuals of IWT flagship species (Sumatran Tiger, Sumatran Rhinoceros, Sumatran Elephant, Black-crested macaque, Anoa and Babirusa) killed by poachers annually in the 2 project demonstration areas
1.1: The following key legislation gaps are addressed by improved IWT legislation documents approved by Government:
-Minimum fines and sentences increased to provide deterrent effect;
-Non-native endangered species including elephant, rhinoceros, big cat and pangolin species given legal protection
-Indonesian protected species list updated to include all CITES Appendix 1 and globally threatened species
- Authority of forestry civil investigators improved
- Detention/prison evaluation for creating deterrent effect and rehabilitation for criminals.
- Online trade regulation to address online wildlife trafficking.
1.2:Inter-agency taskforce in place and operational as indicated/measured by the signing of an inter-agency agreements targeting IWT
2.1: Strengthened institutional capacity to combat IWT as indicated by
i) the ICCWC Indicator Framework (note – baselines to be determined in year 1)
ii) UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard for Gakkum (see Annex 18)
iii) Operational status of Gakkum's Information System
2.2:
- Annual number seizures/arrests
- Annual number of successful prosecutions
2.3:
- Annual number of joined up transnational counter-IWT operations-
- Annual number of seizures as a result of transnational counter-IWT operations
3.1: Enforcement effectiveness at 5 key trade ports (Jakarta, Surabaya, Bitung, Belawan and Kualanamu airport), indicated by:
- Annual PortMATE assessment tool scores (average score for KSDA, Customs, Port Management Authority at each port)
3.2: Effective enforcement of two subnational regions known to include significant wildlife trade routes, measured by :
- annual number of IWT seizures at the project sites
- annual number of IWT investigations leading to arrests at the project sites;
- annual number of successful IWT prosecutions at the project sites
4.1: number of project lessons documented and used by other national and international projects.

Institutional capacity for implementation and enforcement at the national and international levels.Strengthened institutional capacity for regulatory coordination, implementation and enforcement at the national and international levels

Scaling-up improved enforcement strategy at key trade ports and connected ecosystems. Improved enforcement strategy demonstrated and scaled up at key trade ports and connected subnational regions with key ecosystems

Knowledge Management, M&E and Gender Mainstreaming. Implementation and upscaling/replication of project approaches at national and international levels is supported by effective knowledge management and gender mainstreaming